updated: 2022-01-23_12:32:31-05:00
updated: 2021-12-02_08:45:00-05:00
Nick
- Tesla
- Nice font, clean slides
- Only semi-autonomous, name is confusing (Autopilot)
- 37m trip, hands were only on the wheel for 25 seconds
- public beta
- Not a finished polished product.
- Good Pacing, Nice flow
- Junior Developer
- least individual influence, greatest collective
- is code adequately tested?
- Costs associated with these things
- if concerns are ignored by management, whistle blower
- high personal cost
- Team Lead
- more influence, not to steer company
- Help facilitate the actions that individual developers can take on a greater scale
- encourage everyone to voice their concerns
- speak on behalf of the team
- cost could be to take the 'blame' for pushback
- Senior Developer
- most direct influence
- Address all three concerns
- "listen to those who work for you"
- Encourage inter-department communication
- Get advice about software's suitability for public release
- Ethical course of action for everyone is pretty much the same
- Personal risks if marginalized individuals is higher
- Cost can change, but ethics are the same
- Nice relaxed pacing
Pawel
- Volkswagen
- 2006, 'clean diesel'
- used software to cheat emissions
- 40x higher emissions than US standards
- Could not meet these standards
- Driven on a road vs being tested
- Some concerns, involved discussions, told to destroy documents
- If you under perform, you will be replaced
- Code of conduct:
- promotion of interest
- make sure opinions don't harm the group
- silence must be maintained
- Compliance with rules
- promotion of interest
- 2.8 billion penalty
- discovered on accident
- ACM CoE not consulted when making 'defeat software'
- Nice looking slides, too much reading from the paper, basically just reading the paper
- too slow, it's several minutes in and you haven't gotten to junior, team, lead section
- Needs to practice more
- Corporate Ethics vs ACM Ethics
- Marginalized group shouldn't be a factor?
- Cost is health risks
- Corporate culture punishes whistle blowers
Trevor
- Decent slides, kinda long text across the screen, maybe make text ~60% of the screen, not 90%
- Tesla
- AEB did not brake
- driver didn't take any action
- no defects with design or performance of autopilot
- performed as designed
- False sense of security
- SAE level 2: partial automation
- most people believe that it's SAE level 4: high automation
- Good job not looking at notes. Nice relaxed pacing
- Has notes, but doesn't look at them unless you forget something: 💯
- CoE: ACM
- Nice job showing the sections of ACM, a small 2 word summary, and an explanation
- Very easy to skim
- Public Good, avoid deception, regarding issues
- Unaware if engineer's concerns were addressed
- (vagueness is bad)
- Junior
- Explain consequences of public beta testing
- Reputation when speaking out against Tesla, Loss of Job/trust
- Team Manager
- stop beta testing
- costs: loss of job, safety of users, team moral shift
- Lead Programmer
- Stop testing
- most impact
- higher ups looking to change